"Dogs in the City" with Justin Silver: Gimmicky at best

Leslie Smith Editor in Chief of DogTime.com
Leslie Smith, Editor in Chief
Wednesday June 6th, 2012
Column_dogs_in_the_city_kiss
Justin Silver of Dogs in the City

At a time when there are serious issues facing the dog-loving community — Breed Specific Legislation, overcrowded shelters, animal cruelty — CBS chose to lighten the mood with a fun new reality show about dog training. The ratings-guaranteed ingredients for Dogs in the City's first episode? Models, a skateboarding Bulldog, and Justin Silver — a slick-haired New Yorker who specializes in dog aggression.

Silver is actually the star of the show: dog walker by day, comedian by ambition. And there’s nothing wrong with the formula. Training your dog should be fun, even funny at times. But like all seemingly simple endeavors with the potential to go horribly wrong, the person in charge should at least appear to know what he’s doing.

I believe Silver is probably a very nice guy who means well. In each of the three scenarios presented in the show’s debut, however, I found some of his approach to be disconcerting, if not downright harmful.

In the first segment, we meet Beefy, a Bulldog who dictates where his owner sleeps, eats, walks, etc. Silver suggests buying a baby gate to help establish a bit of separation between dog and owner. He hopes to teach the dog that being alone is fun. Or at least tolerable.

Silver’s initial thought seems like the right idea: Create an inviting “alone-zone” for the dog. With the owner on one side of the gate, I expected Silver to set Beefy up with a treat-stuffed kong, a prized toy, and a comfy blanket on the other. But Silver waits to give Beefy the kong until after he complains (barks) about the arrangement. In other words, he rewards the barking behavior.

He then describes Beefy, whose most serious problem (ostensibly) is not getting what he wants, as having separation anxiety. Sort of akin to a doctor telling a person with a cold he that has pneumonia. The former is very treatable, doesn’t usually get out of hand. The other is a serious matter that is not cured with a cough drop. Or five minutes behind a baby gate.

In the next segment, Silver “helps” the head of a modeling agency with her dog Charlotte. The problem: Any time a human or canine enters the woman’s office, Charlotte growls, lunges, and charges. Or, allegedly, bites.

Silver is well aware of this, yet he still recommends bringing in another (smaller) dog to "see what happens." As predicted, Charlotte goes after the dog and indeed makes contact. What kind of trainer allows a dog to practice this behavior? What kind of human orchestrates a scenario knowing a smaller animal will be harmed?

Unacceptable. Period.

In the last segment, Silver demonstrates his technique for teaching “leave it.” It involves introducing a high-value item (turkey) and then physically pushing the dog’s chest or knocking her under the chin when she goes for the meat. Problem number one: Leave it can be, and usually is, taught without using physical force.

Problem number two: The person he’s instructing is a petite, nine-year-old girl, while the animal is a hundred-pound Bernese Mountain Dog. I’ve never seen an obedience command that couldn’t be taught without physical corrections (in other words, positive reinforcement can be used to teach any cue). And if you’re teaching a child to train a dog, safety alone says that positive reinforcement is the only way to go.

I’ll give Dogs in the City one more chance tonight. I hope I’m pleasantly surprised by what I see.

  • Tags
  • News
  • Around the Web
    winkandasmile

    To the person who wrote this article: Sorry, but shame on you. Justin clearly loves and cares about dogs! And what he does obviously works! Are you going out there and helping owners and their dogs? Have you not seen the hundreds of dogs already in shelters needing homes? There are many dog owners out there who are clueless and frustrated with how to handle their dogs bad behavior. So everyone ends up suffering for it. Sadly, the dog usually suffers the most. Abused, abandoned, thrown in a shelter or put down. Thank God for Justin, he's fantastic! Finally, someone is stepping up to show/help owners with what to do to solve their problems. You don't have to agree with or like all that he does. What matters is he cares, helps people, and gets positive results. So please stop putting someone down that loves dogs and is actually helping them and their owners. You should be supporting anyone who is trying to help, especially if it prevents more dogs from ending up in shelters or being put down!!! Are you out there doing anything to help prevent that? You may do things differently than he does, but that doesn't make his ways wrong (obviously the things he does has worked-plus he has a show and you don't hmm). And it certainly doesn't make your ways right. So please keep your damaging “opinions” to yourself.

    11 months ago by winkandasmile

    Donna

    I believe that any show that furthers the idea that with positive steps, canine behaviors can be modified and families can be kept intact, is a good thing to have on TV. When I read a review in which the reviewer is attacking the physical being of the people in the show by making snide comments like "a slick haired New Yorker" I immediately question that reviewer's agenda. So, what kind of show do you, Ms. Reviewer, believe they can responsibly pack into 60 minutes every week? I just want the "cause" and ideology of saving forever homes for canines to be put forth in positive ways. A smile doesn't hurt a thing, you know.

    12 months ago by Donna

    sojaynyc

    I couldn't agree more with your article. There are many well known dog trainers and behaviorists that have outstanding reputations whom are well respected within the industry, many of whom have written books, and yet for sensationalism on TV they select 'the handsome guy with the gift of gab who is good in front of the camera, but is actually an actor/comedian/dog walker' (I know this to be true, because i know him personally). It's frustrating. In my opinion, as a dog trainer, he was incorrect on the first episode saying the English Bulldog had "severe separation anxiety". The dog had a classic case of indulgence by owner, hence was demanding attention. Incorrect information has the potential to harm dogs. Period. CBS is totally to blame here. I found it appauling.

    about 1 year ago by sojaynyc

    LuxeMutt

    I thoroughly enjoyed this show. To all the dog trainers getting themselves into a tizzy please understand – TV has to be entertaining first and foremost. No one is taking every little detail as training gospel. Justin is good looking, funny, personable, and does know a thing or two about dogs AND people. Nobody is going to watch a dry dull show even if that show contains fabulous training techniques. Most dog owners know absolutely nothing about dog behavior. This show at least introduces them to some ideas and possible solutions they can use at home. You may also cry, laugh, or disagree with Justin, and that's OK.

    about 1 year ago by LuxeMutt

    Recent conversations on these topics

    • Willamette Animal Rescue previously NW Animal Rescue Alliance- BUYER BEWARE

      This organization “Willamette Animal Rescue” is NOT a foster based program as her adoption website portrays. There are only a few fosterers’ mainly consisting of family/friends. There is a facility with 150+ sick, starving, dehydrated, and wounded animals. You can conclude that these helpless beings are clearly neglected! She (Alicia Inglish) has previously operated Northwest Animal Rescue Alliance, as well as having many aliases. This all can be found just by googling around. WE NEED TO COME TOGETHER AND HELP THESE ANIMALS FROM THESE MONEY HUNGRY PEOPLE. THEY DO NOT CARE ABOUT THESE POOR AND UNHEALTHY LITTLE BEINGS! THIS IS A VERY UNORGANIZED so called "NON-PROFIT" BUSINESS. IF THIS WASN'T TRUE WHY ISN'T SHE ALLOWED TO GET ANY ANIMALS FROM (WILLAMETTE HUMANE SOCIETY or MARION COUNTY DOG SHELTER/DOG CONTROL)? WHY WON'T SHE ALLOW ANYONE IN ON THE INSIDE? WHY IS THERE NO PHYSICAL ADDRESS ANYWHERE FOR THIS SO CALLED RESCUE GROUP? I am one of her many ex-volunteers, who is trying to bring this to closure, (as I heard from a Marion County Worker). I blindly came into this situation assuming these helpless beings were rescued by a good heart. This is far from the truth! Her intentions are to only benefit herself! The physical address of this so called foster based organization is: 8955 Pueblo Ave. NE Brooks, OR. 97305 (Above the main door, there is a blue awning that says Softball Oregon. It is the second building to your right. It is across from Chemeketa Brooks Facility). There is a travel trailer on the backside of this building where she hoards more animals. There is also a white van in front of the building where she stores the hazardous waste material, being she can't even afford appropriate garbage service. Due to her unhealthy disposal of waste, the animals are at great risk for further disease. Of course this makes their habitats very unhealthy and is NOT proper care. She continuously struggles to come up with her $4000.00 rent fee for the building each month. Unless there is food donated (which very rarely happens), the animals go hungry. Just by standing on the outside of this facility you can smell how unsanitary the inside is. Upon volunteering I became very tight chested, which caused an asthma attack. It smelt of strongly concentrated urine due to dehydration and feces. Their feces as well as their urine contain blood. Every single animal in this facility has diarrhea. Make sure you contact Oregon Humane Society, ASPCA, local news, local police, local shelters, Better Business Bureau, town commissioner, and city mayor with all your situations. This woman finds/collects these animals all the way down to CA and up into WA. Being she can’t have animals from the local Salem shelters, make sure our voices are heard at all Northwest shelters. Warn everyone you know!

    • can you love your sog tooo much

      i that think you can love your dog too much so what do you think please leave a reply

    • Is safe/not living with a dog while I am pregnant?

      Is it safe to live with a dog while I am pregnant? As far as I know that prenatal development is very important. Everything can be a teratogen. Teratogens are substances that can harm my baby for instance dogs' hair. I have a story that is a true story. My doctor had two grandchildren who were deaf since they were born. He was trying so hard to heal his grandchildren, but unfortunetly, they could not be healed. He went to Singapore to check them up, and doctors in there told him that the cause was toxoplasma. My doctor's daughter used to have a lot of dogs inside her house. What do you think about this story? I want to know more about that because everthing has a possibility that we never know. I don't want to conduct an experiment with my own baby. That's why I am so curios. Thank you readers.

    • switching teams

      I worked at a vet clinic for sometime. We sold the veterinary level foods from several different brands. The kinds pets need when they have extreme food allergies or diabetic or renal care. This food is on the higher end of pet food price range. About twice as much as grocery grade foods. But still we regularly have people come in buying the best for their furry babies. One time, a man came in to pick up the renal food for "his wife's" cat. I think for the case of canned cat food the total was $24. He jokingly scoffs at the cost and hands me a credit card. Then he says, "I can't believe I'm spending this much on cat food. I never used to be a cat person. I didn't get them. I was a dog person. I understand dogs, they show you exactly what they're feeling and thinking. Who would want an animal that doesn't run up to you when you get home? But now that we've had these two cats, I get it. It's a different kind of love. It just took having them to understand it." I haven't worked at that clinic for a few years now but moments like that are still crisp and vivid in my mind. It sounds like a similar transition for your dad. Maybe it started as a quest for companionship but turned out to be such a close camaraderie. Congratulations to him on his newfound love and hopefully this will be a new point of connection for the two of you.

    Editor's Notepad
    Square_50_dogtimers

    by Leslie Smith on April 30th, 2013

    What does Conan O'Brien have to do with DogTime and CatTime? Officially: not so much.

    Square_50_screen_shot_2013-04-16_at_11.37.56_am

    by Leslie Smith on April 16th, 2013

    Though her body was burned, Tess's gentle spirit remains intact. Can you provide a home for her?

    Square_50_ware_scar

    by Leslie Smith on April 9th, 2013

    Guess who's keeping Louisville player Kevin Ware company following his devastating leg injury.

    Square_50_312563_473465236027927_1205081492_n

    by Leslie Smith on March 28th, 2013

    Spunky Terriers? Got 'em. Mellow lap dogs? Mm-hmm. Everything in between? Yup, pretty much.

    See all Editorial Posts »
    Wahl_content_hub_promo

    Welcome to DogTime.com

    DOGTIME LOGIN or SIGN UP

    close