Ad
Ad

Animal crusader takes on overcrowded animal shelters

California pet lovers prepare to do battle, again, over a bill that calls for mandatory spaying and neutering. At stake is nothing less than the lives of hundreds of thousands of cats and dogs.

27 comments | Leave your own comment

<p>Once Judy Mancuso concluded <br />there was no way to find homes <br />for all the pets in this country, she <br />crafted a spay/neuter bill. </p><p> </p>

Once Judy Mancuso concluded
there was no way to find homes
for all the pets in this country, she
crafted a spay/neuter bill.

 

The bill that would make fixing your pets the law in California was actually born far away in a New Orleans shelter. That's where Judie Mancuso, who'd flown down from her home in Laguna Beach to aid the post-Hurricane Katrina animal rescue effort, concluded that enough was enough.

"When I walked into that shelter and saw that every animal in there was unaltered--animals who'd been running loose on the streets!--I thought, we have a huge crisis on our hands," she says. "I knew my next goal would be to put together a statewide spay/neuter bill."

Not being a resident of Louisiana, she settled for introducing the bill in her own state of California, and hopes other states will follow suit.

Chucking the "pinky in a dam" approach

Mancuso's activism began long before then. In 1990, a TV special on pet overpopulation turned her from a carefree, meat-eating high-tech professional into a vegan animal rescuer. "It showed all these healthy, beautiful, wonderful animals going to the euthanasia table," she recalls. "I was just blown away. I couldn't believe that's how we dealt with the problem."

She started raising money for shelters, fostering animals, trapping feral cats, and staffing adoption events. Just prior to her fateful trip to New Orleans, she'd even quit her information technology job to devote herself full-time to animal rescue work. She and her husband, Rolf Wicklund, had already decided to forgo kids for the cause.

But it felt a bit like sticking her pinky in a dam that was constantly springing more holes--an estimated 800,000 holes a year, according to one estimate of how many dogs and cats are abandoned in California each year. Roughly half those animals are euthanized.

"Every time we'd make some headway and save a couple animals, someone would dump more," says Mancuso wearily. "The litters just kept coming through the door. Oh my god, kitten season...!"

Crafting a new rescue strategy

While setting up yet another adoption event with fellow volunteers to place still more homeless animals, the talk kept circling back to the same question: Why aren't more people spaying and neutering their pets? Since Mancuso had observed, time and again, that many owners can't be bothered, she decided it was time for a new strategy.

When she got back to California, Mancuso asked Ed Bok, general manager of Animal Services in Los Angeles, to work with her on crafting a mandatory spay/neuter bill. He agreed, and the two started making the rounds, visiting animal care and control officers, veterinarians, police officers, breeders, and service dog groups for help in turning the idea into AB 1634, or the California Healthy Pets Act.

The American Kennel Club objects

When Assemblyman Lloyd Levine introduced the bill to the California assembly in February of 2007, it churned up a political storm the likes of which the capitol hadn't seen since the debate on gay marriage.

"It's amazing how motivated people are, both for and against," Assemblyman Anthony Adams told the Capitol Weekly last summer, at the height of the frenzy. "I've never been lobbied this hard on anything."

On the con side were many breeders and the American Kennel Club. Not only does the AKC object to taking the spay/neuter decision out of the owners' hands, says their spokesperson, Lisa Peterson, they doubt such a law would work. She argues that backyard breeders won't comply with the law, and reputable breeders will end up getting penalized.

"The animals that show up in shelters come from a wide variety of situations, from dogs who've been relinquished by their owners to feral cats that are brought in," says Peterson. "To come up with one solution that only targets one segment of the pet owning population--the responsible owners--doesn't seem like a good plan."

Although many animal welfare groups back the bill, at least a few will sit out this legislative round. San Mateo County has one of the oldest mandatory spay-neuter ordinances in the state--of 20 cities in the county, five have required spaying and neutering since the early '90s--but the head of the local humane society, Scott Delucchi, says he won't be lobbying for the bill.

"We've tried things on our own that we think are far more effective in getting people to alter their pets," he says, "such as educational outreach and low-cost spay/neuter services." He adds that when people are forced to fix their pets, they can become more angry than enlightened. "In some ways, the ordinance hurts us."

Santa Cruz makes a compelling case

Proponents counter by holding up Santa Cruz as an example of what the law could be. The county has had a spay/neuter ordinance in place since 2006 and the local SPCA says its euthanasia rate has dropped 64 percent since then. "We've had a tremendous decrease in the number of animals coming in," says Tricia Geisreiter, a spokesperson for the Santa Cruz Animal Services Authority.

Lake County, Santa Barbara County, and L.A. County have all recently passed similar ordinances. Officials there say it's too soon to tell if it's making a dent in the overpopulation problem. But they do note that the program is proceeding smoothly, with none of the big brother elements that critics fear.

"We're not knocking on the doors of responsible owners saying, let's see your papers," says Paula Werner, program manager of Lake County Animal Care and Control. "But if you're a bad breeder who doesn't take care of your animals, you bet we'll be on your doorstep."

Supporters also dismiss fears that the law would mean the demise of the beloved mutt. At best, they say, the law would cut down on 'oops' matings and on litters coming into the shelter. But it's not going to stop them completely.

"There are still going to be plenty of dogs and cats in California," reassures Michael Markarian, executive vice president of the Humane Society of the United States, one of the bill's supporters.

A second push to pass the bill

The bill squeaked through the assembly in June of 2007, passing by a single vote. But the following month, Levine pulled the bill when it seemed like members of a Senate committee would vote it down. But he didn't give up on it.

In January of 2008, Levine reintroduced the bill to the State assembly. It faces a vote in April before the same committee; if passed, it will move on to the full Senate.

Mancuso's confident that the second go around will be the charm. "We have tons of support, especially when the state's experiencing a $14 billion deficit and we're offering a bill that saves taxpayers' money," she says.

If the bill passes and succeeds, Mancuso and her supporters believe other states would be close behind with their own spay/neuter laws. "As California goes, so goes the country. We think it could be pathbreaking animal welfare reform," says HSUS's Markarian.

In the meantime, Mancuso's still meeting with legislators to craft a version that will pass. She celebrated the annual Spay Day, on February 26, at a signing ceremony that will make spay/neuter mandatory in the city of Los Angeles; the rest of L.A. county has already signed on.

The same vision that ignited her rescue work, feeds her resolve now. She's just tired of seeing healthy cats and dogs killed for lack of a home. "It's going to be an honor to make this bill happen," she says.

________________________________________________________

BackTalk. Are you for or against California's spay/neuter bill? Please let us know what you think.


27 comments | Leave your own comment

Ad



Comments

AvatarI would like to see the bill back in action. Todays date is 10-10-08 and I dont know at this time if there is anything in the works to try again. I am a dog breeder and I care about the animals first, I only breed them because I love them so much and want to make it possible for other lovers of my breed to have one. I only have a few at a time. I think I saw that breeders could still breed if they did what was required of them. I am for that. I am only concerned about all the animals out there without homes that someone carelessly created. I go to great length to educate and inform possible puppy buyers what they can expect and try to help them decied if this is right for them. Many times i have talked people out of a puppy from me. I think that people should give animals credit, they do have a brain! They are so smart. There are many people that think of them as their kids and that is great but to the ones who dont, please start thinking of them that way and would you abondon your kids and not think another thing about them? In my opinon anyone against the bill only cares about money and would probably are thae type who would sell their children if they could get enough money for them. I want to see it in action again. As I read, CA sets the stge for the rest of the country. I think it would be great for the idea to sweep across the country. AKC, if you really cared about animals you would be for this.” — pjk_holloway3, Oct 10 2008

AvatarIf these damn "greedy" apartment owners would allow more tenants to keep their dogs with them, we could adopt more animals from the shelters. We cannot hardly pay their high-flying rents, and then they want to keep us from being able to own a pet. I'm mad as HELL about this! We don't have to spay or neuter animals..., it's the "greedy" apartment owners who want more money for their apartments and don't care about their tenant's happiness. Shirley, Van Nuys, CA ” — suninmars, Oct 03 2008

AvatarJudie Mancuso did not craft the original text of the California Spay Neuter Ordinance. In fact, once Judie became involved with the project, it went downhill. Isn't it ironic that her own home town doesn't have a spay/neuter ordinance, nor does any city where she has resided in the past ten years! She's manager to alienate a passel of the media and former supporters. Judie -- please leave the important issues ot others! ” — leestevens19..., Sep 06 2008

See all 27 comments

Add a comment


newest topics:

News

See ALL topics in this forum

Subscribe to News 20 topics, 87 posts
Button_topic_start topics replies views last post
>>> Tammy Grimes: heroine or criminal?

Did Tammy Grimes cross the line when she took a suffering dog out of a stranger's backyard? Or did she do the right thing, no matter what the law says? Share your thoughts with other readers here.

18 3019 Jun 17, 2009 7:50pm by M-slice
view
GUESS WHAT!!!!!!!

i love my doglett.... hes my best friend

0 57 May 27, 2009 4:37pm by Odysseus
view
Chow mix? Help!

Hi, can someone please tell me what mix is that, I believe it's a Chow mix, but i'm not sure... Thanks! :D http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/9140/dscf0594.jpg

4 458 May 23, 2009 9:49pm by marknikholas
view
Is safe/not living with a dog while I am pregnant?

Is it safe to live with a dog while I am pregnant? As far as I know that prenatal development is very important. Everything can be a tera... (continued)

6 1926 Apr 29, 2009 6:58pm by cleoparker
view