My 7th lesson: No Kill must cast a wider net; first step is a name change

Monday June 20th, 2011

  • Share on Facebook
Column_1shelterdog
Shelter pup waiting for adoption.

by Leslie Smith, editor

March, 2011

On Thursday, a man brought a Heeler mix he called Jack to the front counter. The sight horrified those present, and the stench permeated the entire shelter grounds. Jack’s right front leg had been mutilated, and the injury was clearly not new. According to the man, the dog had been hit by a car about six weeks ago, and he was now worried maggots would begin eating away at the infected limb.

From the socket hung what looked like a partially-eaten chicken drumstick. In places, no skin, no cartilage, no tendons. Just completely exposed bone with a knob at the bottom where his paw turned under and a round, deadened area at the top connecting the leg to what was left of his shoulder. (Photo here. Warning: extremely graphic.)

This is not a wealthy community, and the actual shelter building reflects the area’s depressed economic conditions: cement floor, blocky brick walls, makeshift signs, and ramshackle shelving. What it lacks in beauty and warmth is made up for by an utterly devoted staff.

When Jack arrived, there was no question they’d do everything they could for him, despite knowing his medical care would cost thousands of dollars. The dog would not be failed by humans again.

This, from a “kill” shelter.

Every statistic is a story

When it comes to declaring mission accomplished, No Kill success boils down to a numbers game: We measure our progress in quantifiable steps forward (and backward) until we get to a nationwide live-release rate of 90% or higher. That is, 90% of all treatable animals who enter a shelter, leave the shelter alive.

But this is not a numbers issue. Every statistic represents a real animal, real suffering, real death. Imagine if you hadn’t gone to the shelter that day and your own dog was now the one now being led to the euthanasia room instead of lying at your feet as you read this. Every animal who receives the gas chamber or the blue juice is the one you might’ve adopted. Every dog or cat is someone’s almost chosen one.

Better shelter efficiency, adoption, and certainly education are all part of the equation. Changing the shelter experience, while not immediately doable in most places, is also key. (Facilities like ARF and the Humane Society of Silicon Valley have done an amazing job of transforming the perception of “animal shelter” from depressing to inspiring. Their campuses offer an extensive menu of animal-centric activities, everything from kids’ day camps to public walking trails to pet-friendly cafes.) All of the above are important items on the grand to-do list.

But in one generation, and with relatively (I said relatively) fewer human and financial resources than it takes to install new shelter leadership or make over our municipal facilities, we can get this epidemic under control. Yes, it all comes down to spay/neuter and in the end: fewer animals for whom to find homes, great homes for all who need them.

“No Suffer”: the new No Kill?

I’d like to see the U.S. become a No Kill nation. But my even greater hope is that we become a No Suffer nation. No animal deserves to die simply because the shelter is full, but neither does he deserve a life devoid of exercise, companionship, security, and medical care.

The success of a No Suffer movement would be harder to measure, but its impact, at least as profound. We’ll have achieved it when our animal cruelty legislation is strictly imposed and enforced, when our shelters are all but empty, and when euthanasia is a reprieve from incurable affliction, not a method of population control.

No Suffer would mean we’re not classifying animals in terms of how adoptable they are, but instead, we're devoting resources to any dog or cat who needs extra care. Ultimately, we’ll know we’ve become a No Suffer nation when we’re no longer keeping track of those animals we, as humans, have failed. When the reality is truly a humane society, where every creature is respected and treated with compassion.

More dog Content
  • Square_100_picture_2

    May 9th, 2011

    by Leslie Smith, DogTime editor July 2010 A big, blonde Retriever mix died in his kennel today. Hed been at the shelter for just over a week, picked up as a stray. During his time there, I never once...

  • Square_100_chained_dog

    May 30th, 2011

    by Leslie Smith, DogTime editor November 2009 A family in our neighborhood keeps their dog on a chain, probably twelve feet long, attached to a stake in the ground. Their unfenced backyard butts up...

  • Square_100_dogtime_s-no-kill-series-af

    July 6th, 2011

    Every day, 10,000 companion animals are euthanized, simply because nobody wants them. DogTime examines alternate ways to unburden our overcrowded shelters.

Debbie Tucker

I doubt that there will be a name change at this point. No Kill calls killing healthy, adoptable pets "killing" and killing for mercy "euthanasia". The name of the movement is short, easy and appropriate. One poster stated that there are 800 No Kill shelters in this country. This is incorrect. Unfortunately, there are only about 20 or so right now, since many that SAY they are no kill are NOT, plus the movement aspires to OPEN ADMISSION No Kill, not the many closed admission No Kill. (see no-killnews.com) It is important to dig deep when a shelter promotes that they are no kill, and look at their numbers. Many simply reclassify the pets into categories of too sick or too weird (behavioral assessments that are ridiculous) in order to excuse the amount that they kill. No Kill has proven - many times over - that the 'benchmark' is to save a minimum of 90% of the pets that come in. Anything less than that certainly means that the place is killing decent pets, not euthanizing only as needed. And there are No Kill shelters saving 97%, which is fabulous! I also urge people to look at the transformation of a run-down shelter into a wonderful place for pets to find new homes, done with brilliant fund-raising and partnering with the community. http://vimeo.com/26974723

7 months ago by Debbie Tucker

RottweilerLover

The issue is not the shelters, Vets or the people running them. Its the people of this nation. I hate to think that anyone or a government should tell us how to live, but we need to face the fact that no one should be allowed to have an animal of any kind unless the meet criteria of finance and living conditions. Does that mean if you're poor you should not have an animal? If you have a hard time feeding, clothing and taking your children to the doctor... Then how the hell will you take care of an animal? We also need to stop all backyard breeding and people selling pets in parking lots and the kill issue will became a lot lower.

11 months ago by RottweilerLover

lovablek9s

There are about 4,000 animal shelters in the US, and 800 of those are no-kill .... about 1 in every 5. The numbers of pets euthanized is still way too high, and it will take many combined efforts between rescues, breeder restrictions, more adoptions, and tighter spay/neuter laws to bring the numbers down. No-kill usually means the shelter does not euthanize for space, but most still do for behavior and medical issues that are terminal or cannot be corrected. The down side of this is that these shelters can turn away animals that are not adoptable, and they will most likely end up at a kill shelter. I still believe most shelters are doing the best they can .... it is the irresponsible pet owners who dump them off that need reform. Pets are family!

11 months ago by lovablek9s

DesertPits

The term "no kill" doesn't necessarily mean no-kill. As several have already mentioned, shelters may call themselves no-kill but they do kill because an animal has behavior or medical problems and they do not have resources to try to rehabilitate them. Many rescues are turning to the larger rescue groups such as Best Friends for help with dogs such as these but they will no longer take them either. There are few options available for dogs with behavior issues. A rescue in the community where I live calls themselves no-kill and they don't kill, at least not directly. If they take in a dog and find that it has any kind of behavior problem or serious medical problem, it gets shipped off to the county animal services shelter where it is then killed. Some people in this community have figured this out and they feel that this rescue is lying. If you call the rescue and ask them if they do this they deny it but animal services personnel tell you otherwise. Perhaps some other terms are in order to reflect what a shelter or rescue truly practices. Many people do not agree with no-kill either. I worked a case last month where a small rural shelter that is no-kill, and I do mean absolutely no kill unless the animal is too sick or injured to be saved, was in a heated battle with their staff vet. He was pushing them to start euthanizing for space. The one ACO was not picking up any animals unless it was absolutely necessary because they were so full. They were looking for help to move some animals to other rescues. They normally had about 5-7 other rescues/no-kill shelters that would take animals but they no longer would because they also were full. This little shelter was gettting backed into a corner. The ACO told me that the staff would walk out before they would agree to kill for space. I suspect they may have done just that because I have not heard anymore from them and I called and left messages twice and no one has returned my call. This is a prime example of no-kill not working. We have to solve some other animal welfare problems before we can truly reach true no-kill.

11 months ago by DesertPits

Recent conversations on these topics

  • My own family bought from an irresponsible breeder last week ....

    My boyfriend's parents just announced last week, "We got a German Shepherd puppy!" At first I thought, "hmm, really, another shelter dog? You can hardly handle the two you have now." But then I find out they used ... gag me ... CRAIGSLIST to find this breeder, and that ... gag me again ... it only cost $200. The "breeders" own both parents, so I'm sure they'll do it again. They were selling these puppies for so cheap because they were only 6 WEEKS OLD. Ugh. It makes me so mad I want to find out where these people live and ... well, I don't know what I'd do. And here's where I agree with you, Leslie, 100% on the need to stop irresponsible backyard breeders. It also makes me mad to think that I'm somehow lumped in with those people. I want to yell at my boyfriend's folks, too, but that won't do any good. I need to cool off for the moment.

  • What my conscience says as an amateur breeder.

    Greetings from Greece. Iam not here to advertise or to show off for my actions but this what my conscience said to me.... I am an amateur breeder,desperate in need for money due to the crises in my country,however,I haven't bred my show quality bitches for one more time because I haven't had at least five deposits well in advance for five of the future puppies. Surely one of the reasons is that I wouldn't be able to afford keeping more dogs at the moment but I would never ever risk the future of a puppy to somebody who would take one for free or a very small amount of money just because he found the chance of a breeder under "pressure".Moreover,I would never give any of my puppies to a pet-shop or a "dog - trader". I keep in touch with the ones who bought a puppy from me in the past and I am really delighted each time I hear that they have a happy life with them.Even happier when I meet some of them and I see it myself. Breeding should be a professional job only in matters of quality.If you totally rely on it for survival it could and up in a disaster for you and your animals. Am I wrong?

  • Whether or not dog breeders are irresponsible is irrelevant

    what is relevant is irresponsible pet owners allowing the numbers of unwanted pets to grow. I think it has little to do with breeders and a lot to do with societies throw away attitude when it comes to everything, including their pets.

AD
Trifexis-icc-300x90

Welcome to DogTime.com

DOGTIME LOGIN or SIGN UP

AD
AD